Glorious Panda
vsLeobog Ink Crystal V3
Hear them
Side by side
| Glorious Panda | Leobog Ink Crystal V3 | |
| Type | Tactile | Tactile |
| Sound | Balanced | Balanced |
| Loudness | -43.5 dB | -23.4 dB |
| Pitch | 2,046 Hz | 2,698 Hz |
| Spring weight | 64.5 g | 63.6 g |
| Actuation force | 44 g | 36 g |
| Bottom-out force | 90.1 g | 76.4 g |
| Total travel | 4.1 mm | 4 mm |
| Tactile bump | 50 g | 60 g |
Force curves compared
Both curves modeled from each switch's measured actuation, bottom-out and tactile-bump values.
Which should you pick?
The Glorious Panda and Leobog Ink Crystal V3 are both tactile switches, but they feel and sound different enough to be worth comparing directly.
Glorious Panda runs the heavier spring at 64.5g versus 63.6g — about 0.8999999999999986g more — so it feels more deliberate under the finger, while Leobog Ink Crystal V3 is quicker and lighter to press.
On sound, Leobog Ink Crystal V3 is the louder of the two at -23.4dB versus -43.5dB (20.1dB quieter), pitched higher at roughly 2,698Hz. It reads as balanced, while Glorious Panda comes across more balanced.
Both are tactile, but Leobog Ink Crystal V3 has the stronger bump at about 60g versus 50g.
Pick Glorious Panda if you want a heavier, more controlled press and a quieter typing sound. Pick Leobog Ink Crystal V3 if you'd rather have a lighter, faster press and a louder, more present sound. Use the players above to hear which one you actually prefer.
Full pages
Hear the difference for real
Load either switch into the live simulator and A/B them with your plate, case and keycaps.
Open the simulator →